Home > Deeds of the Muhammad-So called Prophet of islam, Quran - Explanation, Religion, Islam, Qur'an, baqarah, Bakarah, Cow, Koran, What is islam > The Muslim judge in the Ayodhya dispute reminds Muslims of Hudaybyah (via Dikgaj’s Weblog)

The Muslim judge in the Ayodhya dispute reminds Muslims of Hudaybyah (via Dikgaj’s Weblog)

I find that it was Muhammad who first broke the Treaty of Hudaybiyya, not the Meccans who are usually blamed via for the event years later. Muhammad ended up not honoring his word. The fact that he did return some dowry money does not mitigate his actions of not returning the women and not keeping his word. Once again, Muhammad has another convenient “revelation”, and God gets stuck with the blame.



Later, other Meccans came to Muhammad and according to the Treaty asked Muhammad to return some women. Muhammad refused to honor his word and the Treaty. Instead he had the Muslims return any dowries that were given to the women.

“Umm Kulthum Uqba Muayt migrated to the apostle during this period. Her two brothers Umara and Walid sons of Uqba came and asked the apostle to return her to them in accordance with the agreement between him and Quraysh at Hudaybiyya, but he would not. God forbade it……Sirat page 509.

The Sunan of Abu Dawud in volume 2, #2759 says:

“….Thereafter some believing women who were immigrants came. (Allah sent down: O ye who believe when believing women come to you as emigrants). Allah most high forbade them to send them back, but ordered them to restore the dower.”

Muhammad claimed that now God allowed him to break the Treaty, stating the conditions were only a test of the Muslim women‘s faith. Once again, Muhammad has a convenient “revelation” justifying his actions [see Sura 60:10]. Once again, Muhammad puts the responsibility on God’s shoulders for his sin, i.e., allowing him to break his word

The three judge panel of the Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court, in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh, has finally delivered three separate sets of judgments on the disposal and questions of title and rights to a disputed land. The land in question being an ancient site, now reported by the Archaeological survey of India to have been occupied by humans  from at least 1300 BCE, and traditionally long held by faithful Hindus to be the birthp … Read More

via Dikgaj’s Weblog

  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: